Abstract
Despite the broad interest in Al-doped lithium lanthanum zirconium oxide (LLZO), the wide range of reported ionic conductivities suggests that the effect of processing parameters on the resulting phase purity and bulk conductivity is not well-understood. Here, we synthesized six separate series of LLZO with variations in Al concentration, Li excess, Li addition order, Li source, densification method, and mother powder to determine the effect on the composition, phase purity, density, and bulk conductivity. We found that a wider range of compositions (6.08–7.61 mol of Li and 0.06–0.23 mol of Al) than previously reported can result in cubic phase stability and that nearly all elements (Li, Al, Zr, and La) are lost to the MgO crucible during calcination and sintering. The manner in which different elements are lost is affected by the processing parameters. We observed that Al-doped LLZO shows great compositional flexibility in stabilizing the cubic phase, offering an explanation for the range of electrochemical performance metrics reported in the literature.
